Scope It Quickly
Send us the site, your timeline, and any letter that arrived, and we confirm scope and a fee in writing. Fifteen minutes on a call works just as well. If a response deadline is driving this, say so and we will work to it.
ADA · WCAG 2.2 AA · Title II & III
If a letter has already landed, the useful next step is a real audit, a documented remediation plan, and visible progress on the fixes. That is what we produce, as an independent ADA compliance consultant rather than a widget vendor. An overlay does not produce any of the three.
If a letter has arrived, the work it asks for is well defined, which is the one genuinely reassuring thing about the situation. Counsel usually wants an independent WCAG audit, a prioritized remediation plan, and documentation that the work is underway. We can start from wherever you are.
Four numbers worth knowing if this is your first accessibility audit. None of them are about us.
About 30 of 55
WCAG 2.2 has 55 Level A and AA success criteria. Most of them turn on judgement a scanner cannot make, such as whether alt text is correct rather than merely present. Automated testing is where an audit starts, not where it ends.
$100 to $350
Per-page pricing is the common model, so your page count drives your fee. A store with 300 products on one layout is 300 pages under that model. Ask any provider whether they count pages or templates before you compare two quotes.
$500 to $12,500
That is the span of publicly listed prices across the providers on our comparison page, and the conformance document is often billed separately on top. Quotes vary this widely because scope definitions do.
28%
We checked 107 recognizable software companies for a conformance report a buyer could actually read. Fewer than a third could produce one without a form or a sales call. The full finding is published.
New to this? The buyer’s guide explains what you are actually paying for, why two quotes for the same site can differ tenfold, and the questions worth asking any provider, including us.
Competitor figures read from each provider’s own published pages on 2026-08-04, and re-checked quarterly. Our own figure is not among them: we size an engagement on a fifteen-minute call and fix it in writing before you commit.
Send us the site, your timeline, and any letter that arrived, and we confirm scope and a fee in writing. Fifteen minutes on a call works just as well. If a response deadline is driving this, say so and we will work to it.
Manual WCAG 2.2 AA evaluation with real assistive technology. Findings organized by fix location with before/after markup, ranked by how much they get in a real person’s way.
A publishable accessibility statement, documented progress, and re-verification of fixes as your team lands them.
One flat fee, agreed before you commit and covering everything the engagement delivers. Fifteen minutes on a call is enough to size it. How engagements work. Your delivery date is committed at signing, not estimated: signed ACR by Day 21 on a Focused engagement (Day 45 on Standard, Day 60 on Professional), backed by automatic late-delivery credits. Fix verification then runs on your team’s schedule; a typical full cycle, fixes included, lands around Day 75.
Figures are competitors’ own published list prices where they publish at all. Most firms at this tier and above quote privately. See the full comparison.
Want to see the real thing first? Read the sample VPAT/ACR and the sample remediation plan, published in full, or browse all deliverables.
You will be talking to Andrew Szigety, the accessibility consultant who runs your audit and signs your report. Fifteen minutes, no pitch, and you can end it owing nothing. We work out what counts as a template, what your deadline needs, and where your product is awkward, and you leave with a fee and a delivery date.
Harbor provides technical audits and documentation, not legal advice. Engage counsel for any legal matter; we’re happy to work alongside them.